I thought I might add a little something to my last two posts:

All you early Obama voters are stuck with him now. Good job. None of you thought anything could come out in the next few weeks that would hurt him, but, guess what, they did… Although I think if you’re the kind of person to vote early, then his aunt and the fact that we’re not allowed to ask if he has a birth certificate won’t bother you too much anyway. There’s so much stuff out there on him that even if you voted for him back then, you were already blind to everything.

I really don’t get how people could for for someone who:

• Associates with terrorists like Bill Ayers.
• Was an active member of the socialist New Party.
• Is endorsed by the Communist Party of the United States.
• Openly told a small business owner that spreading the wealth is good.
• Is supported as US President by terrorists in the middle east.
• Doesn’t take care of his family when he constantly claims he does.
• Received massive donations from those directly responsible for the financial crisis.
• Still can’t admit that the surge strategy in Iraq was a success.
• Think it’s great that people have to spend 4 dollars a gallon for gasoline.
• Supports leaving babies to die after they’ve been born in spite of failed abortions.
• Trained ACORN members in the art of getting people registered to vote.
• Is willing to talk to evil dictators without asking for preconditions.
• Will support the radio “Fairness Doctrine” if it reaches his desk.
• Will increase taxes on businesses, increasing the rate at which they move overseas.

The list goes on and on… But let’s ignore all that because he’s giving us FREE MONEY with redistribution of wealth and increasing taxes and penalties on businesses to provide cheap and free health care. Let’s sacrifice everything just so we have the illusion of having more money. The greed of money truly is the root of all evil.

Update 1: I forgot to mention the fact that his own VP candidate, Joe “Gaffe Machine” Biden, said to mark his words that in not more than a few months, certain countries of the world will rise up to test Obama with some sort of crisis and that Obama won’t respond in a way that’s popular with the voters, but to keep the polls up and give him support through the hard time. Wow. You can’t make that up.

So I decided to split my last post into two, since they’re both heavy topics. The first dealt with the fact that the courts are throwing out lawsuits that try to force Obama to show his birth certificate because we regular folks don’t have the standing to question someone on something that big. Scary stuff. But I’m going to talk about another thing that’s come out that you WON’T hear on the mainstream media! Obama’s charity.

You all know the rigamarole Obama spews forth about how we all need to take care of our neighbors. His books and his speeches are filled to the brim with “I am my brother’s keeper” (giving a sick twist to a biblical quote) and that he takes care of his family and that we all need to take care of each other. Over and over again. This is pretty much the core of his political throne: We have to help each other. And to reinforce the idea that he’s the guy to do it, he keeps bringing up his family and how he takes care of them. The media made a collective “aww!” when he went to visit his ailing grandmother (the same grandmother he called a “typical white person fearing everyone she doesn’t know”). They made such a gargantuan deal about the fact that he put his campaign aside for a day or so and visited his grandmother… But you can bet your bottom dollar they won’t report this little gem.

It turns out… That someone found his aunt living in some Boston slums. The best part about this is that it was a UNITED KINGDOM NEWSPAPER that covered it! We have to rely on other countries who are interested in our politics to get unbiased information on our candidates? That alone should be a wake-up call to all you mainstream media outlets and all you liberal Democrats. As much as I love the UK for doing this, it sickens me that they have to… They shouldn’t have to report breaking news like this on our own presidential candidates. It’s getting that bad, America.

This is the aunt mentioned in his books… The one he insinuated that he felt a responsibility to take care of. He clearly hasn’t, eh? Obama is incredibly rich, folks… For all the “I’m a family man” talk he vomits forth, he sure doesn’t walk the talk. Now, I was willing to overlook the fact that Obama’s half-brother is living in a hut in Kenya on a buck a month, because he’s a half-brother. I’m going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt and say he might not have known he had a half-brother. Chances are he did, but I’m going to let this one slide. (Although I might also point out that this was another UK paper that pointed it out. Thank you, UK!) But this is the aunt he’s talked about in his own book, Dreams from My Father. What excuse does he have for not being aware of the livlihood of the family member he spoke of in his book with the context of having responsibility to take care of his family? She’s been there for years and nobody knew she was related to him. Guess that means he doesn’t visit much, eh? She’s disabled, too… She’s the prime target of Obama’s financial redistribution efforts and she’s not getting any help… And what is Obama saying makes him the best guy to redistribute all your money? The fact that he takes care of his family. What is the argument he uses all the time? That those with a bunch of money have an obligation to help everyone worse off and that the government is going to step in, tax workers a lot more and then evenly distribute it to everyone, workers and non-workers alike. He says the rich need to have their money taken away and given to the poor because it’s the right thing to do and he can tell you think because he’s taken care of his family!

But he doesn’t take care of his family. Go figure!

While this clearly isn’t as large of an issue as the fact that the courts have told us all we have no right to ask for Obama’s birth certificate, this is still a very big problem. Everyone who’s voting for him is doing so because he’s going to “help” this country! Everyone’s expecting him to follow through with all his promises, but if people would actually look for substance behind those promises, they would be sorely disappointed. But the liberals don’t WANT to do that… They think that if they keep their eyes closed, all of that will be meaningly, so they’ll keep ignoring it and praising their Almighty Obamessiah, Savior of America!

What a bunch of lies. His whole life is one giant lie. Where he was born, how he was raised, how he lives his life now that he’s rich, and what he’s going to do… It’s all one gargantuan lie and it’s all right there to see if people would actually go look. I’m almost of the opinion that if this country is stupid enough to elect a creep like this, then we deserve the collapse of everything we love.

Even with 4 days left, Obama’s character and honesty keeps failing… He’s one of those guys where even if you think you can’t get any more negative coverage of this guy, hey, presto! You get more! Of course, you will hear absolutely none of this on the mainstream media who is working overtime to get this guy elected in spite of all the problems that keep bubbling to the surface. It’s amazing how much the media is sacrificing. Their own stocks and viewerships are tanking and they don’t seem to care in the least bit… Good ol’ American mainstream media. But anyway! What’s new with Obama? They’re big ones!

First up… Remember when I mentioned that lawsuit in Pennsylvania that took Obama to task on his eligibility to be President? Basically, he’s never shown a 100% legal birth certificate, and even the one he’s shown everyone online is not an official birth certificate. The number is blocked out so nobody can verify it and terminology is wrong for the time he was born. All things accounted for, it’s probably a fake… So a Democrat lawyer decided to sue Obama to get him to show us all his real birth certificate like McCain did when people tried to peg him as ineligible because he was born in Panama. (McCain was born on a military base, which is considered American territory, but he also showed a real birth certificate, and that shut everyone up. Why didn’t Obama do it at that time, too?) But guess what?

The lawsuit has been tossed out by the judge. (This link is to a blog, but they provide a source to the court documents if you can’t take my word for it.) Surprise, surprise. Obama didn’t show anyone his birth certificate, and instead managed to get the suit thrown out because, and I’m dead serious, we “voters” apparently don’t have enough “standing” to call out a candidate on something this big. Do you realize how utterly TYRANNICAL this is? A normal voter doesn’t have enough clout, enough standing, enough authority to ask a candidate for the President of the United States of America if he’s even ELIGIBLE for the office. What happened to “a government of the people, by the people, for the people”? If voters don’t have enough power to question something like this, we’re looking at the reason why we split from England in 1776. There is NOBODY more powerful than a voter when it comes to voting! The courts (and Obama) have managed to shut someone else up who might wreck their campaign and there’s serious Constitutional ramifications.

The guy who brought the lawsuit up to begin with put it perfectly:

“This is a question of who has standing to stand up for our Constitution,” Berg said. “If I don’t have standing, if you don’t have standing, if your neighbor doesn’t have standing to ask whether or not the likely next president of the United States–the most powerful man in the entire world–is eligible to be in that office in the first place, then who does?”

If the regular person, the regular Joe, doesn’t have the ability to walk up to a POTENTIAL (I mean, he’s not even a President, yet) President and ask if he’s within the Constitution to run, then who on this entire planet does? Democrats? Please, the guy who opened this lawsuit used to be the chairman of the Democrat Party in the county he’s from. Not them. Republicans? Don’t be insane. We’re all already labeled as racist morons who are trying to stop Obama from becoming President because he’s black, not because he’s INSANE with his policies. I, and many others, ask you: Who can stand up for the Constitution?

Come on, people. You have to prove your citizenship for a Driver’s License! I had to show them a copy of my birth certificate because I didn’t have many other forms of identification! We have to show a birth certificate to drive a stupid car, but Obama can’t be bothered to show a birth certificate to become the President of the United States? How ridiculous is that?! The fact that he hasn’t waved around a dumb piece of paper before now has to tell you something… What is he hiding? McCain’s come out and shown his! Obama has not, even after a lawsuit, felt the need to show his own. Why? WHY? And why are all you Democrats ignoring this? Insanely un-Constitutional! Insanely un-American! This is absolutely apalling and astonishing! Obama has the chance of not even becoming a President and no “regular voters” are allowed to make sure?

Does anyone realize how dangerous and frightening this is? Obama is showing over and over again his complete and total disdain for the United States Constitution. It is THE governing document of our country! Nothing supercedes it, and Obama couldn’t care less about it. What’s more, the liberal courts couldn’t care less about it, either! They’re going to stop you “lowly normal people” from enforcing the Constitution. This, my friends, is BIG. This is revolution big. If our government and judicial system isn’t going to enforce the Constitution, and it’s not going to let the citizens enforce the Constitution, then something needs to change and it needs to change NOW. It’s that big. Let me beat this into your heads, people… Nothing, nothing, nothing is more important than the Constitution in relation to our government and when the government isn’t going to adhere to it… Well… Then we all have a huge problem.

And just think, you Democrats. All this can be avoided if Obama would show some stupid piece of paper. I cannot comprehend how you would so blindly vote for this man. He’s the very definition of anti-American and anti-Capitalist, but none of you seem to care in the least bit. That’s horrifying.

Ah, ya’ really gotta love ‘em… In another attempt to deflect the issues, some drive-by reader left another comment just now that pretty much lifts a spill of text from a liberal blog that doesn’t actually give proof of what they claim. Hey! This sounds familiar… Actually, I think I recently made a post all about those kind of comments! Deja vu, eh?

To make it clear, since you all seem to have a problem with understanding this: I don’t want garbage plastered all over my comments section from liberal blogs, okay? If you want to leave a comment, go ahead and actually spend time on it. Formulate your own opinions and maybe do some fact checking for yourself before you post. While this site is obviously a self-published source, I do usually make sure I link to proof of what I’m claiming so you can hear or see, for yourself, in the entire context, what is actually going on. I link to videos… I link to documents… I link to sourced articles… I don’t link to blogs unless THEY have sources. I give my take on things and then I give you links so you can go check them out for yourself! Liberals rarely use them, apparently, since they continue to enjoy sticking their heads in the sand, but I keep on putting them there.

I don’t want to hear you relay some sourceless opinion piece from some random site I don’t care about, okay? Is that really all you have to defend your position? Regurgitated ickiness that you can’t even be bothered to give your own insights into? A crude copy/paste job, sometimes even without a link (in which case I use some creative searching)… No time and no effort spent on it at all. Well, guess what? I ain’t gonna spend time on you, either!

So, Mister Orolo… Your comment has been deleted! Don’t let the door hit you on the way out. (Although I commend you for actually signing with a name and email address, even if they might be fake. Not many people even bother to go that far.)

So what do I see after I hit Publish on my last post? A comment on my Obama the Socialist Revisited post that pastes an article about how Obama has leads in “key states”. I don’t think the comment was from a malicious liberal, since it was headered with “more bad news”, but I’m not going to post the comment anyway. Why? Well, you know how I feel about polls, right? I made a post about it all the way back in June. When someone tells me about the latest poll, whether it’s for or against the person I’m rooting for, I will always think and sometimes say: “Well, I wasn’t asked.” And that’s my whole point.

These things are based off of serious statistical extrapolation. Honestly, the 2008 estimated population is just over 300,000,000. That’s 300 million people. Of course, not all of those are legal voters, but even if 100 million people weren’t voting, that’s still a lot of people to extrapolate for. If you want to get technical, you’re only supposed to take each state’s population, but please, save your breath. I’m not interested in particulars and I only mention it to shut up those of you who would use that to deflect my points as liberals are so keen to do.

But! I’ll humor you. Let’s take the population of Ohio, which has been repeatedly called a key state in this election. 2007 estimated population? Somewhere around 11 million. Okay. I read on Slashdot that a “good” poll consists of somewhere around 1,000 people. This is backed up by the Opinion Poll article on Wikipedia. 1,000 is a statistically good number to poll, apparently. So see, with the absolutely blatant partisanship the mainstream media has in favor of the Democrats, you can bet your bottom dollar that these so-called “reliable polls” are going into the heart of liberal cities, conducting their polls, and then taking it back to their news processors to interpret the results as much in favor for Obama as they possibly can. They’ve done this for as long as I can remember and they’re doing it as I write this. It’s the mainstream media! Anyone at this point who thinks the mainstream media isn’t completely in the tank for Obama and has unceremoniously thrown objective reporting out the window is lying to you and themselves, period. There is absolutely no way anyone can believe that and be honest with themselves, it’s that simple.

So they go into Columbus or Dayton, Ohio and they conduct their poll of 1,000 people. Okay, well, that still leaves out the other 10,999,000 citizens of Ohio, now, doesn’t it? Oh, they’ll pull some mathematical and statistical formulae to bedazzle you with how accurate their poll is and it may very well be statisically “acceptable” for a poll, but it does not at any moment give you even the slightly picture of what the voters are feeling like. I’m sure that mathematical geniuses will at this time want to wring my neck and scream at me as to how foolish I’m sounding and by all means, leave a comment and tell me how wrong I am! Doesn’t mean I am wrong and I will most likely not be inclined to agree or humor you, but you can leave a comment! That’s what comment forms are there for! Go ahead… I want to hear your arguments. Because I have the perfect example that will utterly crush any and every argument you have in support of polling data and how accurate they may be. Ready? Hold on to your hats, folks!

President George W. Bush.

With his name alone, I have flawlessly proved my point that polls mean absolutely NOTHING. Everyone remembers how Bush was supposed to lose to Gore in 2000. The polls called for landslide victories on Gore’s part and reports started flooding in that Gore’s campaign was beginning to “measure for draperies” and otherwise planning their stay in the White House far before the election. (Kind of like how Obama’s campaign is acting right now, wouldn’t you agree?) The mainstream media hyped their polls and estimates so much that all the networks were so eager to declare Gore the winner before everyone was finished counting the votes, because “oh, it’s statistically impossible for the Republicans to win!” Turns out that there was this little state called Florida that managed to vote just barely enough for Bush that he won the election. So close, in fact, that Democrat voter fraud could have changed the outcome entirely, so that’s why ACORN is so important, kids. Since the media has pretty much declared Gore the winner before it was all over with, all the Democrats rejoiced, and then when they heard Bush had actually won, they began their chants of a stolen election in spite of all the evidence (and a court ruling, which the Democrats like treat as Constitutional amendments when the rulings support them).

And then what happened next election? Bush vs Kerry? Pretty much the same exact thing, wasn’t it? According to the polls, nobody wanted another 4 entire years of “failed Bush policies” (a favorite phrase with the Democrats, it seems) and he might as well drop out of the race because John Kerry was going to win the election! Then, shock and horror: Bush won his second term in spite of all the polls. The only thing different this election cycle was the new law that prevented the networks from prematurely announcing a winner during the counting process when it was clearly a tactic to sway voters in the western states. The only thing different this election was that the media didn’t actually declare Kerry a winner, but they sure as heck let the polls do all the talking.

And they’re doing the very same thing again this year. Will they never learn? Polls mean absolutely diddley-squat! If you insist on using them, be aware of this fact and treat them only as extremely broad interpretations of what might happen. Come on, if you poll 1,000 people in a city, then you’re going to get a majority of Democrats. This is a fact. Cities tend to be more Democrat than Republican. If you poll 1,000 people in the rural areas, then you’re going to get predominantly Republican results, aren’t you? Read my lips (or words):

POLLS ARE DESIGNED FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF DISCOURAGING REPUBLICAN VOTERS.

They have been for ages and will continue to be… So ignore them! Ignore them completely! They mean absolutely nothing! Shame on you Republicans who, after this year, think there’s still a shred of reality in any major news network today and shame on your Republicans who look at these polls and think the end is nigh. It’s not! McCain’s poll numbers are higher than Bush’s when Bush was running against Kerry. No mainstream media outlet tells anyone that, now, do they? If you really want to use a poll, look at it that way and it pretty much guarantees a McCain win. But don’t even do that… Don’t listen to polls, period. The only thing that matters in the end is the election process. (Which is being clouded by ACORN activites, but that’s beside the point, although completely relevant to the election despite what Senator Government and his cronies would want you to think.)

Polls have always been a pointless way of determining the outcome of elections… As Election Day draws ever nearer, you’re starting to see the leveling off of several polls (much to the panic of liberals across the country). They still aren’t willing to show McCain with even a shred of hope for victory, but as Rush Limbaugh said a few days ago, the pollsters have the uncanny ability of tilting the results in favor of who they want to win up to and including the day of the election, but as it gets more down to the wire, you start to see some accurate readings. Why? Well, because the pollsters want to be able to say they were right, after all! They want to be able to point at something and say “look how accurate we are! You should use us for poll results!” However laughable it is to do that, that’s what happens… But it still stands that polls mean absolutely nothing. Just repeat that to yourself. Polls mean nothing. Never have and never will.

I leave you with this one last example. The election of 1948. Someone was expected to lose so badly that newspapers actually started printing their next issue with the story of how badly the guy lost! Seems rather like the Bush vs Gore debacle if you ask me, but nope! It wasn’t… Know who it was? Harry Truman vs Thomas Dewey. Truman was expected to lose… He didn’t… At all. In fact, he won by a shocking landslide of 303 electoral vote! Here’s the proof:

Republicans have seen that picture an awful lot lately… You Democrats should appreciate this especially, because Dewey was the Republican! Imagine a time where the mainstream media actually tried to elevate a Republican… Wow. Whether or not it was intentionally done, as Wikipedia is so keen on trying to explain away, the fact remains that polls are a sickeningly poor method of predicting election outcomes. Even if you think the mainstream media really isn’t biased for Obama (which, if you do, you’re insane), there’s no arguing that polls have been shown time and time again to be dead wrong and used almost solely for discouraging voter participation. Don’t let it happen. Get out there, vote for McCain and Palin and show everyone we conservatives mean business and that we’re not going to sit by and watch a Socialist take over this country just because all the lazy liberals want government checks and “free” health care.

I’d read a blog post… It said they were voting for Obama. It didn’t really list WHY they were voting for him, but it sure spewed a bunch of campaign lies in response to the “baseless attacks” from the McCain campaign. Basically, they went “I’m voting for Obama because he didn’t do these things like everyone thinks.” In other words, it was a load of hogwash. The post smashed Joe the Plumber, it tried to paint Obama’s Ayers connection as irrelevant and it tried to push off Obama’s Socialist tendencies as an overreaction. I’ve got news for you people… You’re clueless. You have your heads in the sand.

The evidence is out there and it keeps popping up all over the place. You can turn your head and cover your ears and pretend it’s not there, but you cannot keep your American honor and dignity if you say these accusations are flat out lies. You have absolutely no idea what you’re talking about and it really shows. The best part of all these posts is that they are, more or less, strictly opinion posts. No sources, no links of any kind, just these people running their mouths off, making themselves look like idiots to anyone who actually checks into this kind of stuff. As such, I have more proof to support my claim that Obama is a Socialist, seeing as how documents that place him in the Socialist Party of the United States isn’t enough for you to flee from this guy.

Seriously, if that alone doesn’t scare you (coupled with the fact that he’s officially endorsed by the Communist Party of the United States now), then the audio clip I’m going to post probably won’t scare you, either, because you’re too googley-eyed for your free government checks and free housing and free health care to give a darn about American values and everything that made this country so amazing from Day One. As I’ve said before, since I can’t figure out why anyone would do that, I’m starting to have trouble overlooking this approach to the election and I’m having trouble associating with those kinds of people. They don’t explain themselves and think it’s not a problem and they pretend nothing’s wrong when THERE IS SOMETHING WRONG. An American calling themselves American and yet supports something like this is not a true American. It’s like a Christian calling themselves a Christian and yet not act like anything close to what the Bible dictates. It’s the very definition of a hypocrite, and that word is tossed around so much that it’s lost its impact, but that title should not be taken lightly.

In 2001, Barack H. Obama was invited on to a Chicago radio station and guess what he talked about? Redistribution of wealth and how the Constitution is ill-equipped to allow for it. (Gee, ya’think?) You know, that thing he was talking to Joe the Plumber about? That thing everyone voting for him is trying to hard to ignore. (Actually, they’re not trying very hard at all, they just act like it’s not an issue and give no excuses at all…) Even if you think the answer Joe the Plumber got was a slip up on Obama’s part and he didn’t actually mean it (which, if you do, you’re just lying to yourself). I mean, all you have to do is look at how hard the mainstream media and the Obama campaign tried to crush him after he got the answer nobody wanted to hear. Yeah, that’s a good policy… Someone finally gets you to say something you actually believe, it turns out it’s something absolutely horrific, and then you try to destroy THE GUY WHO ASKED THE QUESTION. I lack the vocabulary to describe how revolting it is what they did to Joe the Plumber, a regular American citizen like you and me, just because he asked a question that Obama answered truthfully for once. So you’re going to vote for someone who has no problem smashing citizens who ask questions of their government? ISN’T THAT THE REASON OUR FOUNDING FATHERS DECLARED INDEPENDENCE? You’re all laughably ignorant!

What I’m about to show you is not really a video, but it’s hosted on YouTube and has some text, so it would be wise to watch the whole thing. Let’s put it this way: If you were truly unbiased and cared about what the candidates stand for, you would watch this entire thing. What you do afterward shows your thought processes… How can anyone sacrifice everything for a bit of free handouts? There’s an old saying that’s begun to float around again in light of all this. It’s been attributed to Benjamin Franklin:

When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.

How true that is… Look at what people are willing to part with just so they can have government aid in many aspects of their life. Welfare, health care, redistribution of wealth… Get the government involved and make the economy “fair” for everyone. After all, those rich snobs don’t deserve the money they worked so incredibly hard for, do they? You couch-potato, beer-guzzling, dead-beat dads should be given more money because you’re so poor! Poor things! Here, let’s give you all of Rich Man’s money so everything’s fair! Remember what Gerald Ford said, too:

A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take from you everything you have.

Which if the prime reason why the United States declared independence from the Monarchy of England. The government got too large and started messing with everything all the way down to religion and daily lives and it was a colossal mess. Seriously, do none of you read history anymore? Does Obama not read history? The so-called “Constitutional Scholar”? History is filled to the brim with examples of how never to run a country, and yet they all keep trying to run them that way and it always fails… Always, always, always. And you Democrats who dare call yourselves Americans are wanting the United States to follow suit when the ONLY reason we’re so powerful and rich is because we adopted a completely and totally free market capitalist system that rewards hard-working people and punishes lazy freaks. (Well, that and we founded the country on solid Christian principles, whether you want to believe it or not.) But you’re willing to throw all that away and lower ourselves to the level of the rest of the world and encourage sitting on your butt because you’re going to get everyone elses money, anyway? Absolutely obscene…

But now I think I’ve given enough of my own commentary. Here’s the video:

God help us if this unapologetic Socialist wins the election.