Archive for August 7th, 2008

Monkey Kick Off

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

Uhm... I'm not usually one to share these silly little Flash games that I come across, but this one I found via StumbleUpon that actually has a sort of... Sharing ability to it. Control the monkey, kick the ball as far as you can and then you get an address that you can post that'll show an instant reply and a chance for other people to break your record! I managed to kick a doozy of a distance after a couple of tries, and then managed to shatter that record by another impressive amount. I guess I'll keep editing this post if I keep increasing my lead! But, without further ado: The links!

4548 meters:

http://www.totebo.com/monkey-kick-off.php?c=qqortqorBoErUorFBoUBoppsostsFogZjSNkOLTouqEt

5095 meters:
http://totebo.com/mko.php?c=qrorsForsoEquorFBoUBopptotBUtogZjSNkOLTouFpp

UPDATE (September 2, 2008):
5181 meters:
http://totebo.com/mko.php?c=qBorqsottouqrorFBoUBoppqotpFpogZjSNkOLTouEFt

5578 meters:
http://totebo.com/mko.php?c=qporrrosUouuForFBoUBoppsottEFogZjSNkOLToEqrr

Eureka

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

You know who's stupid? The Sci-Fi Channel. Yep.

A couple years ago, they went on a huge spree in the name of providing us with more entertainment. They cut show title sequences from 3 minutes to 60 seconds. They claimed it was so we would have more show to watch, but everyone knows it's so they would have room for a few more commerials. To be honest, the shortened Stargate Atlantis title was absolutely HORRIBLE compared to the pure genius of the full length. The crew of Stargate made a big fuss and everyone made general mayhem about it and, next season, Sci Fi gave them back their 3 minute introduction, much to the happiness of everyone involved.

Now... Eureka? Not so lucky. This series STARTED the year they cut the titles to 60 seconds, so it was built from the ground up to have a 1 minute title sequence. Quick, catchy... It was pretty good for 60 seconds. Would have enjoyed a typical 3 minute artistic phenomenon, but oh well. Well, this year? Eureka's title sequence is a whopping 10 seconds. I kid you not... 10... Seconds... Long. It's JUST enough time to see Sheriff Carter standing in the road with the sun behind the leaf and then BAM! The title aaand... Cut! That's it. I am ticked off to no end... I am very unhappy. I liked the Eureka tune and now it's just DOO-DEE-DOO... END. Ugh. I really dislike Sci Fi's way of running things.

You know Gilligan's Island had 36 episodes in Season 1, 32 episodes in Season 2 and 30 episodes in Season 3? Talk about HUGE SEASON. 98 episodes total and only 3 seasons. That's almost 4 equivalent seasons of Stargate and 7 equivalent seasons of Doctor Who. Star Trek? Star Trek (from Voyager down to TNG at least) has consistently been 26 episodes per season. With a full length title sequence, I might add. And did I mention no mid-season breaks? I absolutely loathe the way TV shows are aired these days... Who's brilliant idea was it to cut titles, cut season length and then manage to shove a break (or two, in the case of Lost and Heroes) into the flow of things? I'll tell you who... The publishers. Always the publishers trying to squeeze every last drop of advertisement money from these TV shows that are being adversely affected by all the tampering. Just air it all in one go! Gosh... Seriously, we fans will love the station that does this. Back to the way things were. Pretty please?

Articles and Profanity

Thursday, August 7th, 2008

My popularity has, I'm sorry to say, returned to the normal 30ish hits per day. I wonder how intelligent that is... Like, is it counting search bots like Google and MSN? It says it doesn't count me, so I'm assuming it checks to see if my IP is signed in and nullifies the entries. I'm not exactly sure how many of those hits are actual people, but the statistics does manage to turn up where people come from (usually direct and from good ol' blah.richardpratt.net), what they read and what links they click on. Based on those, I would say that maybe 10 to 15 people show up... Eh, whatever. I'm content with the notion that I can stir up the Internet with my "hairbrained" ideas. In fact, I got some random guy commenting on my Gaffes post. Pretty cool.

That being said... I wanted to let you know that the "Interesting Articles" thing to the right of my blog is NOT an automated feed reader. That's my Google Reader Shared Items Page that it's reading... In other words, the articles that show up there are articles that I've read and found interesting. They're not automatic, so don't think it's just a NewsBusters feed. The only reason they show up so often is because I think they're the most interesting! In fact, at this moment, I have a Slashdot article on there about the Large Hadron Collider. That thing scientists are going to fire up in September to see how things worked during the Big Bang. Talk about a colossal waste of money, though I'm sure they'll find some interesting things during their experiments, they're assuming it'll prove Big Bang or something. I predict they'll generate a black hole that'll suck the planet away from the inside. Or maybe a portal to Xen through which the Combine and Headcrabs and Vortigaunts will pour through and ravage our planet. Man, forget catastrophic global warming... We need to worry about the Seven Hour War.

Anyway, back on track... The reason I thought of this is because I put up so many NewsBusters articles. I thought, for an instant, that I SHOULD just use an automatic feed, but then it wouldn't really be personal... It wouldn't be ME showing you articles, it would just be some brainless bot throwing up things you could find yourself. Not that anyone I know online would bother looking at a dastardly conservative news source. (Even though they have sources upon sources of articles and figures and all manner of undeniable proof to back up their claims, ohhh no. They're conservative... Can't be a trustworthy source. Yeah, yeah. I can hear you all already.) So I've decided to stick with my Interesting Articles widget instead. That way, you can be absolutely sure that I've read and put my stamp of approval on the Interesting Value of the articles. Of course, I make no guarantees that what you'll read will be... Shall we say, family friendly? I mean, NewsBusters has the standards of any public media and cleverly censors the more colorful language that they might be reporting, but the articles about gaming can sometimes be outright vulgar and distasteful. I don't always link to those, even if the game they're announcing is a good title, but if I miss something and link to it anyway, you have my apologies in advance.

You know... Profanity in the media is just something I don't get. At all. I can understand when someone's angry and lets loose with an uncontrollable burst (though that does definitely speak a lot of that person's character), but I can't understand why Kotaku and Destructoid and all the other gaming blogs think it's hip to fill their posts with bad language and perverse themes... Not even in the process of reporting, but just because that's "gamer talk" and they have to speak on our level or something. I think it speaks wonders for this generation if people think they have to swear to "connect" with us. I don't think I've sworn on this blog once... Not ONCE. Well, I did relay that amazing story of Obama's (former) preacher calling on God to damn America, I admit. (Oops, and there's the word again.) But I have not once used bad language on my site anywhere, period. I think that if you have to use profanity to form any coherent sentence, then you're just... I don't know... Sad? Incompetent? Unable to professionally articulate a point?

This is the reason that I don't link to other blogs. It's usually understood that the content on another site is out of my control, but I don't want it to seem that I'm... What's the word... Endorsing? I don't want it to seem like I'm endorsing the blogs of other people by providing links, and when you click on them, they're full of bad language. Most of the people I would link to have a habit of using profanity... Which I guess is okay. I mean, it IS their blog. It's their private space on the Internet and they can say what they want. But that still doesn't change the fact that I'm not going to link to those sites. I don't think profanity is morally right, so I don't want to seem to be encouraging it or overlooking it because I DON'T. That's why I'm apologizing in advance for articles that I might link to that contain profanity... Now, comments are easy to avoid and are notorious for being filthy, so I'm not even going to touch on them. I'm just worried about the articles themselves. I do, however, monitor my comments and block the ones that aren't acceptable for family consumption... They're not acceptable for me, either. If it's a decent comment with a lot of points that I think I might want to address, then I'll filter it on my own. If it's just baseless bashing like so many of the 4chan comments were, then I'm just going to pitch them.

For the record, this is the reason I don't link to any blogs, period. I used to link to a few blogs that I "approved" of... The ones that were worth reading and known to be clean. But then I decided to get rid of them because I didn't want to have to explain to everyone else why I wasn't linking to them. But, you know, now that I've actually written a pretty impressive post on the subject (once again reaching the NaNoWriMo daily quota), I might just start linking to acceptable blogs again. If someone asks why they're not linked, then I'll simply refer them here, or tell them that their blog didn't meet certain criteria! But... I really only have two sites to link to right now, and neither are very active, so there's no problem right now.

But there you have it... The Interesting Articles widget is comprised of articles that I, personally, perused and NOT automatically sorted, so I encourage you to click that little "Read more..." link at the bottom and check out what I think are interesting articles! You won't be disappointing.