Global Warming Residue Alert

According to the San Francisco Chronicle, parts of California got some surprise snow global warming residue. They say Tioga Pass was closed, which gave me a something to go on to discover where, exactly, they got this snow global warming residue. For those of you who don't want to look for yourself, Tioga Pass is part of the Sierra Nevada mountains through which State Route 180 goes through. In other words, Mariposa Country, which is where the article was written from, but I've seen articles written in New York about happenings in Georgia, so I thought I'd double-check myself.

Good ol' Yosemite got a bunch of snow global warming residue when nobody expected it. Seems to me that this is perfect timing! It was only last week that those 31,000 scientists put their collective names on a paper that took issue with the "consensus" of man-made global warming. Now, seriously, I think there's some climate changes going on, but as to the interference of man's devices making the entire planet's surface hotter in general? Absolutely not. For every record heat wave last summer, there was a record ice blast last winter, as well. Of course, with all the hurricanes we've been having, people have been using that as an indicator for global warming...

Except the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration released a paper a while ago with research and numbers proving that landfall hurricane count has NOT gone up since the whole "global warming awareness" (read: scare-mongering) has begun and has, in fact, been generally lower. Oops.

2 Responses to “Global Warming Residue Alert”

  1. PerrySIMM Says:

    http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Oregon_Institute_of_Science_and_Medicine

    "The Oregon Petition, sponsored by the OISM, was circulated in April 1998 in a bulk mailing to tens of thousands of U.S. scientists. In addition to the petition, the mailing included what appeared to be a reprint of a scientific paper. Authored by OISM's Arthur B. Robinson, Sallie L. Baliunas, Willie Soon, and Zachary W. Robinson, the paper was titled "Environmental Effects of Increased Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" and was printed in the same typeface and format as the official Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Also included was a reprint of a December 1997, Wall Street Journal editorial, "Science Has Spoken: Global Warming Is a Myth, by Arthur and Zachary Robinson. A cover note signed "Frederick Seitz/Past President, National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A./President Emeritus, Rockefeller University", may have given some persons the impression that Robinson's paper was an official publication of the academy's peer-reviewed journal. The blatant editorializing in the pseudopaper, however, was uncharacteristic of scientific papers."

    ...

    "In reality, neither Robinson's paper nor OISM's petition drive had anything to do with the National Academy of Sciences, which first heard about the petition when its members began calling to ask if the NAS had taken a stand against the Kyoto treaty. Robinson was not even a climate scientist. He was a biochemist with no published research in the field of climatology, and his paper had never been subjected to peer review by anyone with training in the field. In fact, the paper had never been accepted for publication anywhere, let alone in the NAS Proceedings. It was self-published by Robinson, who did the typesetting himself on his own computer. (It was subsequently published as a "review" in Climate Research, which contributed to an editorial scandal at that publication.)"

    ...

    "None of the coauthors of "Environmental Effects of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide" had any more standing than Robinson himself as a climate change researcher. They included Robinson's 22-year-old son, Zachary, along with astrophysicists Sallie L. Baliunas and Willie Soon. Both Baliunas and Soon worked with Frederick Seitz at the George C. Marshall Institute, a Washington, D.C., think tank where Seitz served as executive director. Funded by a number of right-wing foundations, including Scaife and Bradley, the George C. Marshall Institute does not conduct any original research. It is a conservative think tank that was initially founded during the years of the Reagan administration to advocate funding for Reagan's Strategic Defense Initiative--the "Star Wars" weapons program. Today, the Marshall Institute is still a big fan of high-tech weapons. In 1999, its website gave prominent placement to an essay by Col. Simon P. Worden titled "Why We Need the Air-Borne Laser," along with an essay titled "Missile Defense for Populations--What Does It Take? Why Are We Not Doing It?" Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, however, the Marshall Institute has adapted to the times by devoting much of its firepower to the war against environmentalism, and in particular against the "scaremongers" who raise warnings about global warming."

    ...

    "In addition to the bulk mailing, OISM's website enables people to add their names to the petition over the Internet, and by June 2000 it claimed to have recruited more than 19,000 scientists. The institute is so lax about screening names, however, that virtually anyone can sign, including for example Al Caruba, a pesticide-industry PR man and conservative ideologue who runs his own website called the "National Anxiety Center." Caruba has no scientific credentials whatsoever, but in addition to signing the Oregon Petition he has editorialized on his own website against the science of global warming, calling it the "biggest hoax of the decade," a "genocidal" campaign by environmentalists who believe that "humanity must be destroyed to 'Save the Earth.' . . . There is no global warming, but there is a global political agenda, comparable to the failed Soviet Union experiment with Communism, being orchestrated by the United Nations, supported by its many Green NGOs, to impose international treaties of every description that would turn the institution into a global government, superceding the sovereignty of every nation in the world."

  2. GermanShepherd Says:

    Impressive... It would have been much nicer of you to paraphrase the article in your own words instead of turning my comments section into a wiki entry.

    But, allow me to follow suit:

    http://www.petitionproject.org/gwdatabase/GWPP/Frequently_Asked_Questions.html

    5. Does the petition list contain names other than those of scientist signers?

    Opponents of the petition project sometimes submit forged signatures in efforts to discredit the project. Usually, these efforts are eliminated by our verification procedures. On one occasion, a forged signature appeared briefly on the signatory list. It was removed as soon as discovered.

    In a group of more than 30,000 people, there are many individuals with names similar or identical to other signatories, or to non-signatories – real or fictional. Opponents of the petition project sometimes use this statistical fact in efforts to discredit the project. For examples, Perry Mason and Michael Fox are scientists who have signed the petition – who happen also to have names identical to fictional or real non-scientists.

    6. Does the petition project list contain duplicate names?

    Thousands of scientists have signed the petition more than once. These duplicates have been carefully removed from the petition list. The list contains many instances of scientists with closely similar and sometimes identical names, as is statistically expected in a list of this size, but these signers are different people, who live at different addresses, and usually have different fields of specialization.

    ...

    9. Why was the review article published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons?

    The authors chose to submit this article for peer-review and publication by the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons because that journal was willing to waive its copyright and permit extensive reproduction and distribution of the article by the Petition Project.

TAKE NOTE THAT FIRST-TIME COMMENTS ARE MODERATED!

After your first comment is approved, you will not be moderated again unless you leave a comment with different credentials. As such, there is no problem when your post does not appear right away. Your post may appear for you after submission, but be aware that nobody else will see it until it's manually approved.

Please be aware that profanity will not be tolerated.

Leave a Reply