Sega does what Nintendon’t.
What, fail in the home console market?
Actually, they both did that. Nintendo just managed to bounce back.
WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! Nintendo never failed! Why do people keep insisting that they did? Failure insinuates a complete break down of the product line. Failure defines Sega’s line of consoles… Failure defines RadioShack’s line of computer systems… Failure defines something that does so poorly that the company in question decides to stop producing and supporting the product in question. Nintendo did NOT FAIL in the home console market for the simple reason that they never stopped making consoles during any generation of consoles in history. They began with the NES and never missed a production cycle. Not only that, but they always made a profit on their consoles, whether or not it was the best selling system! The least selling console never automatically means the failed console. A failure would insinuate that the product line sold poorly and made no profit. The Gamecube may have come in last on sales, but Nintendo never lost a cent with it, and that completely destroys the idea that Nintendo ever failed at the console market. They may have been behind, but they were never a failure.
Sega failed… Nintendo did not.